We are truly immersed in the silly season. No
doubt inspired by the tremendously creative political tactics permeating
the American political landscape, Bermuda will clearly see more
hyperbole coming from competing political forces. Alongside this, there
is a sort of petulant propaganda masquerading as an economic recovery
strategy. We see this in the series of arguments made recently by former
Premier John Swan and Larry Burchall.
At
last week’s public forum, Mr Burchall opined that, “Bermuda is
undergoing an absolute decline in its residential population. This
residential population decline underpins and affects everything else in
Bermuda’s national economy.”
Based on this
opinion Messrs Swan and Burchall proceeded to argue, in reverse
Malthusian theory, that Bermuda needs to bring more people to the Island
in order for economic growth to take place. And
so we have a new economic growth theory advanced by non-economists and
accepted nowhere in the world that some of us are actually taking
seriously. Increased number of foreign workers may well be a consequence
of various economic growth strategies but increased numbers alone will
not stimulate growth. Mr Burchall has even gone so far as to identify
the precise size our workforce should be: 40,000.
The
reality is that our residential population has increased, not
decreased, over a ten year period based on the only accurate count of
Bermuda’s population — the census. Between 2000 and 2010 the total
population increased from 62,059 to 64,237, or four percent, the
residential workforce population increased during this same period from
29,970 to 30,729; and the total workforce grew from 36,878 to 37,197.
These facts alone undermine the entirety of their argument.
A
national census is a counting of numbers to allow for proper planning;
it is undertaken at regular intervals to allow for trend analysis and to
smooth out distortions created by sharp upward or downward movements —
such as one would chart business sales and revenue.
The
Swan — Burchall ‘theory’ is based on using figures that came from the
height of our economic bubble, from 2007-2009, our own period of
irrational exuberance, and taking that as the new norm — in direct
contradiction to the most basic principle of statistical analysis.
Adopting that technique is to descend into the realm of propaganda, to
distort and misrepresent figures to meet the objective you seek.
The
remedies proposed by Swan and Burchall are perhaps more important than
the intellectual foundation of their argument. We do have to re-examine
term limits, but not for the reasons they identify: my views on this
issue were outlined a year ago in this column (September 21, 2011). And
we do need to extend greater rights to PRC holders — ideally all rights
as a Bermudian save for a Bermuda passport and the right to vote.
An
increased residential population is not necessarily the outcome of
increased foreign currency earnings for Bermuda. And it is earning more
national income that is key. We have already seen from ABIR’s figures
that they injected more money into the economy last year while
experiencing a 1.7 percent decline in people employed.
I
am also told by friends in the reinsurance arena that new companies
coming to market are driven more by technology and thus require smaller
staff than would otherwise have been the case ten years ago. Further,
outsourcing will continue as cheaper technology is applied to sound
business decision making — hence the HSBC call centre in the
Philippines.
Beyond reinsurance, a successful
regeneration of tourism will generate greater foreign earnings without
the same considerations prevalent in discussion with the international
business community.
Increasing the number of
people today will certainly help in the rental of the many vacant
properties and save commercial property developers who took a gamble
during the bubble. And ideally, with an economic turnaround there will
be modest increases in the population which will in turn provide a
measure of relief in these areas. But no sound economic growth strategy
will have such growth as part of its underpinning.
No comments:
Post a Comment